<dd id="q0agg"><address id="q0agg"></address></dd>

    1. <nav id="q0agg"><listing id="q0agg"></listing></nav>
      <nav id="q0agg"></nav>
      網站首頁 解決方案 項目案例 新聞動態 膜材介紹 關于華喜 聯系方式 EN
      首頁 > 新聞動態 > 公司動態


      發布時間:2021年3月17日 點擊數:1492

      Nowadays, extensive attention has been paid to the edible film made from biopolymers due to the essential role in replacing plastic packaging on food products[1]. Edible films have been utilized extensively to prolong the shelf life and improve the quality of food including fresh produce, meat, dairy or seafood[2]. Especially, the edible films are good alternatives for preserving frozen food as they can reduce water transfer between the food and the surrounding atmosphere, and may enhance structural integrity of food after thawing[3].

      The biopolymers for producing edible films can be derived from different origins, including polysaccharides, proteins or lipids[4]. Among them, the starches are of the most widely usage because of its biodegradability, renewability, abundance and low cost[5]. However, the application of native starch films is limited because of its low water barrier ability, high water solubility and poor mechanical properties[6,7]. Chemical modification has been commonly practiced to overcome the adverse properties of native starches. Previous studies showed that carboxyl groups of the oxidized starch were more hydrophobic and could reduce the sensitivity to the bonded and external water of the resulted films[8]. Meanwhile, Baruk et al[9] reported that water vapor permeability of banana starch films increased with increase in oxidation, and oxidation enhanced the tensile strength while decreased the elongation at break of the films. Yildirim-Yalcin et al[10] indicated that the values of oxygen permeability, water vapor permeability and solubility of the edible films made from corn starches that cross-linked with sodium trimetaphosphate were lower than those of native starch films.

      When stored in different environmental conditions, starch films undergo physical or chemical changes which affect their retrogradation kinetics and result in property variations[11]. Especially, storage temperature can influence the structural characteristics of starch films and change the barrier and mechanical properties. It was reported that tensile strength (TS), elastic modulus and water vapor permeability (WVP) values of cassava starch-based film increased with the increase in temperature (10-40 °C)[12]. Besides, freezing storage (-20 ℃) could slow down color‐change but increase WVP of kudzu starch-based film[13]. During freezing, ice crystal growth induces physical stress, causes phase separation of starch system, and results in rapid starch retrogradation during storage. Upon thawing, the meltwater can be easily released, known as syneresis[14]. Retrogradation and syneresis can be accelerated by repeated freezing and thawing (F-T), which is detrimental to the starch pastes and gels[15]. And chemical modification is commonly practiced to overcome retrogradation and syneresis of native starch[16]. It was report that after a F-T cycle, an increase in the stiffness and syneresis was found in the native corn starch paste, while the negative change did not appear in the hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate paste[17]. Zhang et al[18] found that the freeze-thaw stability of acetate starch was superior to that of native starch and less water was exuded from acetate starch gel. In addition, the carboxyl and carbonyl groups introduced by oxidation might prevent the starch from rearranging and reuniting and lead to reduced retrogradation or syneresis[19]. However, the influence degree of repeated F-T treatment on the performance of starch film is less known, and whether chemical modification can reduce the negative influence of F-T is unclear, which is important for the application in coating or packaging frozen food.

      The major purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of F-T treatment on the properties of starch films including native potato starch (PS), hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate (HDP), acetate starch (AS), oxidized starch (OS). The property parameters included microstructure, mechanical property, water sensitivity, and thermostability.

      1Materials and methods


      Native potato starch (PS), hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate (HDP, hydroxypropyl content of 3.0%) and acetate starch (AS, acetyl content of 1.4%) were provided by GLDARK PMS. Oxidized potato starch (OS, carboxyl content of 1.0%) was provided by Hangzhou STARPRO starch company. Glycerol, of analytical grade, was purchased from Aladdin.

      1.2Preparation of edible films

      Edible films were processed by casting method as previously reported with some modifications[20]. Four different systems were used to prepare film-forming solutions with similar viscosity and the components were listed in Table 1. The aqueous suspensions were stirred at 80 ℃ for 30 min. The resulted solutions were degassed with a vacuum pump for 30 min, casted on glass plates (25 cm × 25 cm) with commercial release agent (JonyeTech, China) and dried at constant temperature and humidity (25 ℃, RH 50%) for 72 h to obtain films with thickness ca 0.1 mm.

      Table 1 Compositions and viscosity values of film-forming solutions for native and modified potato starches. 導出到EXCEL


      Starch (w/v, %)

      Glycerol (w/v, %)

      Viscosity (Ps·S)

      PS 1
















      1 PS, native potato starch; HDP, hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate; AS, acetate starch; OS, oxidized starch.Different letters in the same row represent significant difference between the averages evaluated by LSD test at 5% significance level. GU: glucose units. RVU: Rapid Visco Unit.

      1.3 F-T treatment of edible films

      The prepared films along with the glass plates were frozen at -20 ℃ for 24 h, and then thawed at 25 ℃ for 6 h[21]. The F-T cycle was repeated three times before peeling off the films[22].

      1.4X-ray diffraction (XRD)

      A D8 ADVANCE X-ray diffractometer (Bruker, Germany) was used to observe crystalline structures of starch powder and film (3 cm  3 cm) with Cu-Kα radiation operating at 40 kV and 30 mA. XRD patterns were obtained in an angular range of 5°-35° (2θ) with scanning rate of 5(°)/min.

      1.5Scanning electron microscope (SEM)

      The film was conditioned in desiccator containing P2O5 for 7 days and surface morphology of the film after F-T treatment was observed using a field emission scanning electron microscope (Zeiss, Germany) at 10 kV. The magnification times was 80 000.

      1.6Mechanical characterization

      The mechanical properties of the edible films were evaluated by determining TS and EB using a TA‐XT2i Texture Analyzer (Stable Microsystems Ltd., UK), and the experiment was repeated eight times for each sample[20].

      Film samples were cut into 15 mm × 100 mm strips and clamped using tensile grips probe (A/TG). The initial grip separation was set as 50 mm and tensile speed was 0.8 mm/s. TS (MPa) and EB (%) of the films were calculated as follows:



      where  was the measured maximum tensile strength at break (N), L was the thickness of the sample (mm), W was the width of the sample (mm).



      where  was the measured maximum length at break (mm),  was the original length of the sample (mm).

      1.7Water content (WC)

      Testing samples (0.5 g in weight) were dried in an oven at 105 ℃ for 24 h. WC was calculated as percentage mass loss. Three replicate measurements were carried out for each sample.

      1.8Water solubility (WS)

      The samples were first dried overnight and weighted, then conditioned at room temperature in beakers containing 30 mL of distilled water for 24 h, and finally dried to constant weight. WS of the testing samples was calculated as the percentage of mass loss, and the test was repeated three times for each sample.

      1.9Water vapor permeability (WVP)

      Film samples were cut into rectangular pieces of 80 mm × 80 mm, and sealed over circular acrylic cells (Φ 57 mm × 15 mm) containing distilled water of 11 mL. The cells were placed at RH of 70% and weighted every hour. WVP was calculated as follows[20], and each test was repeated three times.



      where m was the weight of water permeated through the film (g), L was the thickness of the sample (mm), A was the permeable area (m2), t was the penetration time (d) and  was water vapor pressure difference (kPa).

      1.10 Thermogravimetry analysis (TGA)

      Thermal characterization of edible film was measured by Pyris 1 Thermo Gravimetric Analyzer (PerkinElmer, USA). The testing samples (ca. 5 mg) were crushed, placed in alumina cells, and heated from 30 to 500 ℃ at the speed of 10 ℃/min under the protection of nitrogen with flow rate of 60 mL/min.

      1.11 Evaluation criteria

      Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was used to judge the performance of starch film with multiple experimental factors considered[23]. Subordinating degree function was introduced as follows:

      Positive effect:  (4)

      Negative effect:  (5)

      where X (u) was the function value of a parameter, Xi was the data value of the point to be analyzed, Xmax was the maximum value in the data column of a parameter, and Xmin was the minimum value in the data column of a parameter.

      After fuzzy transformation, the performance indexes were turned into cumulative weighted membership value ∑X(u)Y. The larger it was, the better the performance of the film would be. The experimental factors included WVP (negative effect), TS (positive effect), EB (positive effect), and WS (positive effect). The weight subset Y of the comprehensive evaluation was {0.40, 0.2, 0.2, 0.20}.

      1.12 Statistical analysis

      Experimental data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) with SPSS Statistics 19 (version 13.0, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Inc., USA) and expressed as mean values ± standard deviation. The minimum significant difference (LSD) analysis was performed with the level of significance set at P < 0.05.

      2.Results and Analysis

      2.1 X-ray diffraction (XRD)

      The X‐ray diffractograms of starch powders, and starch films before and after F-T treatment were illustrated in Fig. 1. The diffraction curves of PS powder consisted of peak diffraction and dispersive diffraction, indicating that the PS powder was composed of both crystalline and amorphous regions. PS powder showed a typical B-type pattern with reflection peaks at 2θ vales of 5.6°, 15°, 17°, 22° and 24°[24]. The peak positions of modified starches (MS) were consistent with the positions in native PS, while the relative intensities decreased. The reason might be that the molecular chains of the crystallized starch were damaged during chemical modification[25]. In present study, the XRD patterns of all starch films exhibited B-type as well, but the intensities declined as compared with starch powders. After the film-forming process, the crystallinity loss was to be expected due to the disruption of H-bonding between the starch molecules[26]. After F-T treatment, the diffraction-peak intensities of starch films reduced significantly compared with original film curves. The diffraction peaks of HDP film even disappeared at 2θ>17.2°. It was reported that the relative crystallinity of wheat starch increased after multiple F-T cycles, as F-T accelerated organization of double helices or crystal perfection[27]. However, starch suspension was used for F-T treatment in their study, while the mobility of starch chain was greatly restrained in film form at low water content in our research. The repeated F-T might weaken the double-helix structures of starches, and the molecular arrangements became more disordered[28]. It was also reported that F-T disrupted the crystalline structure within starch granules or damaged the short-range molecular order of double helices in the starch granules[28].

      Fig. 1 X-ray diffractograms of native and modified potato starches or starch films.   下載原圖

      Fig. 1 X-ray diffractograms of native and modified potato starches or starch films.

      *PS, native potato starch; HDP, hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate; AS, acetate starch; OS, oxidized starch; F-T, freeze-thaw.

      2.2 Scanning electron microscope (SEM)

      Starch films before F-T presented homogeneous and smooth surfaces without pores or cracks[29]. After three F-T cycles, the surface topography of the films changed (Fig. 2). There appeared obvious cracks on PS film, and the surfaces of HDP and OS films became rougher with many small protuberances. In addition, there exhibited honeycomb and lamellar structures on AS films. During frozen stage, ice crystals formed in the films and caused micro-mechanical stresses. After thawing process, the melting ice crystals led to the relaxation[29]. It could be observed from Figure 2 that the structural integrality of PS film was easier to be destroyed, while OS and HDP films were more stable. It might be deduced that HDP or OS film could better resist the damage of F-T treatment compared with PS film.

      Fig.2 Surface morphology of native and modified potato starch films after freeze-thaw treatment. (A), native potato starch film; (B), hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate film; (C), acetate starch film; (D), oxidized starch film.   下載原圖

      Fig.2 Surface morphology of native and modified potato starch films after freeze-thaw treatment. (A), native potato starch film; (B), hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate film; (C), acetate starch film; (D), oxidized starch film.

      2.3 Water content, Water solubility (WS) and Water vapor permeability (WVP) of starch films

      As shown in Table 2, the water contents of starch films were all around 20% before F-T, and the values went down after F-T. The reduce might be caused by water evaporation and contributed partly to the changes of water barrier and mechanical properties of the films[12,13].

      Table 2 Water content, water solubility, and water vapor permeability of native and modified potato starch films before and after freeze-thaw treatment1導出到EXCEL



      WC (%)

      WS (%)


      (g mm m-2 d-1 kPa-1)





































      1 Assays were performed in triplicate. Mean ± SD values in the same column with different letter are significantly different (p < 0.05). 2 PS, native potato starch; HDP, hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate; AS, acetate starch; OS, oxidized starch. F-T, freeze-thaw; WC, water content; WS, water solubility; WVP, water vapor permeability.

      Film solubility in water is a parameter depending on application. Films used for high moisture foods should have low solubility, while edible films should have high solubility[35]. The WS values of starch films before F-T ranged from ca. 32% to 37%, similar with the reported data[30]. And there were no differences in WS values after F-T, which indicated less influence of F-T on WS values. It was also reported low temperature did not show obvious influence on WS of kudzu starch-based films[13].

      Preventing water transfer between environment and food product was one of the most important functions for food packaging[31]. And for this purpose, smaller WVP was preferred. The WVP values of all the films were similar before F-T, at around 120 g mm m-2 d-1 kPa-1. However, the values increased significantly for PS and AS films after F-T. As seen from Fig. 2, there existed obvious damages in PS and AS films after F-T, and when cracking or fracture occurred, the WVP elevation was sure to be anticipated[3]. However, the WVP values of starch-based films were lower than those of pea starch, rice starch, methylcellulose and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose films[32].

      2.4 Mechanical characterization

      The mechanical property of edible film is required for retaining the integrity and resisting against external stress[33]. As observed in Fig. 3, the TS value of PS film before F-T was 2.29 MPa and the EB value was 68.82%, which were similar with the data of cassava and corn starch-based films[34].

      Fig. 3 Mechanical properties of native and modified potato starch films before and after freeze-thaw treatment. (a) tensile strength (TS, MPa) and (b) percent elongation at break (EB, %).   下載原圖

      Fig. 3 Mechanical properties of native and modified potato starch films before and after freeze-thaw treatment. (a) tensile strength (TS, MPa) and (b) percent elongation at break (EB, %).

      *PS, native potato starch; HDP, hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate; AS, acetate starch; OS, oxidized starch; F-T, freeze-thaw; Different letters mean significant differences (p<0.05).

      Generally, crosslinking, esterification and oxidation modifications have positive effects on mechanical properties and water sensibilities of films [9,10]. However, TS and EB values of MS films decreased as compared with those of PS film in present study, with data of OS film were the nearest (2.18MPa, 59.33%). Biduski et al[29] reported higher TS but lower EB values for acid and oxidation modified starch films, and the different trends with our study might be attributed to the differences of modification degrees and the amounts of active groups[35]. Higher modification degree induced greater heterogeneity in the spacing between action sites. And heterogeneity brought about stress on the chains and then transferred the stress to other chains, which led to the decreased internal resistance[36]. Moreover, higher densities of covalent bonds during modification process did not allow required flexibility of chains to be close enough for physical stabilization by hydrogen bounds, generating low degree of crystallinity[36], which was also found in present study.

      After F-T, TS values of all films increased to 3~4 times of original values before F-T. Although the molecular ordering was declined (Fig. 1) and micro-integrity was damaged (Fig. 2), the loss of water (Table 2) was more related to the enhancement of macro-strength[12]. In addtion, low temperature decreased the molecular mobility and caused cryo‐concentrated effects on films, and resulted in the relatively higher TS as well[13]. EB values generally showed the opposite trend with TS values, while it was worth noting that the EB of HDP film increased to 70.76% after F-T. This phenomenon might be attribute to the inherent properties of HDP, as it was resistant to excessive granular swelling and possessed desired short texture property after F-T[37].

      2.5 Thermogravimetry analysis (TGA)

      TGA could reflect thermal stability of film by measuring mass loss with temperature increase. It could be seen form Fig. 4a that TG curves of starch films before F-T presented four stages of thermal decomposition.

      Fig. 4 Thermogravimetric analysis of native and modified potato starch films before and after freeze-thaw treatment. (a) before freeze-thaw treatment, and (b) after freeze-thaw treatment.   下載原圖

      Fig. 4 Thermogravimetric analysis of native and modified potato starch films before and after freeze-thaw treatment. (a) before freeze-thaw treatment, and (b) after freeze-thaw treatment.

      *PS, native potato starch; HDP, hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate; AS, acetate starch; OS, oxidized starch

      The first degradation stage occurred below 30-150 ℃ could be attributed to water loss. According to literature[38], mass loss at the first decomposition stage related to bound water content, which reflected starch retrogradation. The second degradation stage ranged from 150 to 250 ℃, and corresponded to volatilization and degradation of glycerol. The third stage of mass loss at about 305 ℃ was probably due to the depolymerization of starch and conversion to smaller molecules[8]. The fourth degradation could be resulted from the decomposition of the carbon components coming from the starch and the glycerol[8]. The thermal degradation behaviors of starch films after F-T were similar to those of untreated films (Fig. 4b), and less mass loss of HDP film at first stage indicated less retrogradation degree[38], which was consistent with the result of XRD.

      2.6 Comprehensive evaluation

      As seen from Table 3, PS film presented the best performance before F-T (0.67), indicating that chemical modifications had negative effects on mechanical properties and water sensibilities in present study. However, repeated F-T cycles brought about more damages on PS film, while HDP film possessed much better F-T stabilities (0.80), which might be due to that double esterification crosslinking reaction of HDP starch could better resist the damage of freeze-thaw treatment.

      Table 3 Performance indexes of native and modified potato starch films before and after freeze-thaw treatment 1導出到EXCEL


      Evaluation values before F-T

      Evaluation values after F-T

      PS 2












      Performance index was the cumulative weighted membership value of experimental factors, with higher value indicating better performance. The experimental factors included WVP (negative effect), TS (positive effect), EB (positive effect) and WS (positive effect), and the weight subset of the comprehensive evaluation was {0.40, 0.2, 0.2, 0.20}. 2 PS, native potato starch; HDP, hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate; AS, acetate starch; OS, oxidized starch. F-T, freeze-thaw.


      At room temperature, native PS film had the best mechanical property as compared with MS films. F-T treatments led to damages of starch films, decreased the intensities of crystallization peaks and obviously changed the mechanical property, while had little influence on WS and WVP. HDP film possessed the best overall performance after F-T, indicating it was more suitable for use in frozen low-moisture foods such as frozen dough. The practical significance of HDP film should be further verified considering the storage quality and microstructures of the coated products. However, the performance of starch film should be further enhanced by mixing with other biopolymers or addition of nanoparticles.

      Conflict of interest

      All authors have no competing interests to disclose.

      專題報道             more...
      • 軌道交通中膜結構的應


      • 膜結構建筑保溫內襯技


      • 膜結構幕墻的應用


      • 膜結構屋面的應用


      • 膜結構應用于環保工程


      • 膜結構在污水處理廠中



      硬件實力 質量控制 發展歷程 公司簡介

      軟件實力 經營理念  解決方案 聯系方式


      +021-59198545 400-176-6885 dshx@hxmjg99.com www.artborneo.com 滬ICP備08009856號 使用條款